Conflict: Denied Ops
Developer Pivotal Games
Conflict: Denied Ops is a tactical shooter video game developed by Pivotal Games and published by Eidos Interactive for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. It is the fifth and final installment in the Conflict series. Originally, the game was to be called "Crossfire" but was later changed. It released on February 8, 2008, in Europe, February 12, 2008, North America, February 21, 2008, in Australia and… From Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)
202 reactions from 2 sources (Steam reviews, Bluesky) · newest Nov 5, 2026 · last updated Nov 6, 2026 · How this works
Audience score
72 positive · 102 negative
95% range 34–49%
| Source | + | − | = |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steam reviews | 72 | 102 | 0 |
| Bluesky * | 0 | 0 | 28 |
* shown, not counted in the score (label accuracy below our 85% bar or not yet audited).
What players are saying
Counted from the reviewers’ own thumbs up/down on the 175 English Steam reviews we collected, not by the AI. Valve’s all-language rating: Mixed (263 of 494 positive).
Several reviewers say it fails to live up to earlier Conflict games. [1][2][3]
- [11]
For a co-op oriented FPS made 10 years ago - Conflict: Denied Ops is surely not that bad, as the most of reviews for it here on Steam. In fact, I like the game. Despite all the usual stupidness of scenario, voicing, AI behavior and so on. But... the servers are closed, multiplayer is dead, and the game ain't popular (like Kane & Lynch 1/2, for example), so I doubt it's gonna get many positive marks from the new age …
- [4]
This is the latest in the Conflict series of 1st person shooter games, that really were designed as co-op campaign games. While the game-play and storyline may seem familiar, the controls and overall feel are streamlined and the graphics are the best they've ever been, especially with the "Puncture Tech" technology, which maintains background damage while you play each level. Pros: Very cheap at retail. Fairly …
- [1]
Let me explain, I have great memories of the first 4 conflict games from my childhood. I went back and played them recently and although they have their problems, they're finely crafted squad based shooters that make you think a little and manage resources (mostly in global terror). I see now why this game killed the series for good. Just about anything you can think of that made the other conflict games great is …
- [8]
This game just made me sick after almost an hour of playing. No exact story. You donnu what the hell is happening. kill enemies BANG BANG OOOOH WHAT AN FPS GAME. Horrible gameplay. They don't even pay attention to the basic rules of an fps game. Why the fuck should I aim with "Shift"? No sprinting? ok. No Jump? WTF?! And what the fuck is that sensitivity while aiming? You can't shoot a standing target with …
- [12]
It's not worth it even on sale... i've played very bad games but this one pfff... waaaay over the top of the first one on the list... if i buy a bad game or i don't like it i don't refund, paid 1 euro on this one but i whish i could, you feel better if you give that 1 euro to a homeless guy and he buys alcohol... i don't even like to give negative review's on games but damn... at this one everything is bad... just …
Summarised from 34 of the 192 public posts collected about this game; every point cites the posts behind it ([n] opens the post) and the split is counted from the posts’ own ratings. Updated Oct 13, 2026. How summaries are made
41% of the 175 Steam reviewers we collected recommend Conflict: Denied Ops. The complaint that keeps coming up: buddy AI is dumb and requires constant orders. Deal-breaker or nitpick?
Critics, per Wikipedia
The game received "mixed" reviews on all platforms according to the review aggregation website Metacritic. It was criticized for its unoriginal and generic gameplay and broken co-op system. In Japan, where the game was ported for release under the name Double Clutch (ダブルクラッチ, Daburu Kuratchi), then published by Spike for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions on September 11, 2008, and by E Frontier for the PC version on January 16, 2009, Famitsu gave the first two console versions each a score of all four sixes for a total of 24 out of 40.
From the “Reception” section of Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 4.0. Critic context only — not part of the audience score.
Reactions
60 of 202 · most liked firstDEMS, YOU WIN THE ATTENTION GAME WITH CONFLICT AND CRISIS AND WE ARE SUBMERGED IN BOTH YOU JUST REFUSE TO TALK ABOUT IT
neutral · AI labelView post →Let me explain, I have great memories of the first 4 conflict games from my childhood. I went back and played them recently and although they have their problems, they're finely crafted squad based shooters that make you think a little and manage resources (mostly in global terror). I see now why this game killed the series for good. Just about anything you can think of that made the other conflict games great is not here. first off, they've limited the squad from 4 to 2, which makes planning…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Some exciting news: this morning we launched a collaboration with @icrc.org: our Trust & Safety: Armed Conflict game. trust-and-safety-game.icrc.org
neutral · AI labelView post →Very excited to announce my next game - Lord of the Rings: Circle of Conflict! Co-designed with @podfathergaming.bsky.social ! You play the forces of light and darkness simultaneously, in a unique game experience. Can’t wait to share more! www.officedoggames.com/game/circle-...
neutral · AI labelView post →CAT OF CONFLICT: Oleksandra’s daughter played chess with the cat. It looks like the cat won the game.
neutral · AI labelView post →SNES collectors will know Keita Amemiya's work for the Hudson Soft game Hagane: The Final Conflict
neutral · AI labelView post →For a co-op oriented FPS made 10 years ago - Conflict: Denied Ops is surely not that bad, as the most of reviews for it here on Steam. In fact, I like the game. Despite all the usual stupidness of scenario, voicing, AI behavior and so on. But... the servers are closed, multiplayer is dead, and the game ain't popular (like Kane & Lynch 1/2, for example), so I doubt it's gonna get many positive marks from the new age gamers. In Conflict: Denied Ops you play as a team of two CIA operatives, one…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Ooh I like this game! (spins the wheel) Conflict... (spins a second wheel) Core... ConflictCore!
neutral · AI labelView post →Civil ConFLiCT game winner, Tim Boyle?
neutral · AI labelView post →A real classic. You and your op boy Jamal have to detroy stuff because murica. Jamal is pretty racist against whites which i find insulting considering i identify myself as a white Apache Helicopter. However the game is a tactical shooter. Which, to be fair, is pretty gay. The controls work fine for me. The game is as generic as it gets. Kill russians and people with dark hair and scream stupid sh*t while listening to your weirdly calm commander. Awesome.
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →6/10 Graphics ☐ Beautiful ☐ Average ☑ Outdated Gameplay ☐ Very Fun ☑ Average (Not too bad, but can get fairly same-y') ☐ Repetitive Audio ☐ High quality ☐ Average ☑ Repetitive (The main score is pretty generic, the mixing isn't very good either, over-bass) Difficulty ☐ Very Hard ☑ Average (On hard difficulty it doesn't pose much of the threat) ☐ Too Easy Story ☐ Amazing ☐ Average ☑ Low quality (Generic run of the mill military shooter, cliche story. you know what to expect) Bugs ☐ None…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Untitled Goose Game 2: International Conflict
neutral · AI labelView post →I have no idea why everyone is saying that this game sucks. Maybe all the reviewers are born after 2010 because sure, this game is old but it plays fine on modern systems, the controls are a little different but nothing unplayable and the gameplay is fine, just a standard fps of that era. Yeah, the story is the classic "America saves the world with their super soldiers" but its ok, it has some jokes and "bromance" here and there. The game isnt that much well written as you can expect but on…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Completely generic, clunky controls, abyssmal buddy AI, and graphics that look 4 or 5 years too old for the release date. You -might- have fun if you play it with a friend via LAN or VPN, but even then, it's that "this was bad but it was fun to experience it together" type of fun.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Doesn't live up to the quality set by previous Conflict games
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This is the latest in the Conflict series of 1st person shooter games, that really were designed as co-op campaign games. While the game-play and storyline may seem familiar, the controls and overall feel are streamlined and the graphics are the best they've ever been, especially with the "Puncture Tech" technology, which maintains background damage while you play each level. Pros: Very cheap at retail. Fairly realistic (as far as damage taken/death) in a war setting (besides the "revive"…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →A dangerous game the beast plays today doubling down on his hatred brand Conflict is what propelled him to the top Hatred remains his high octane rocket #fuel Of course the poison spewed will splatter him impotent soon as it has throughout history on all rabid dog demagogues #vss365 #poetry
neutral · AI labelView post →Sometimes I can tolerate low quality FPS games as a way to relax. But boy... I really did not enjoy this one. Take that for what you will.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →I'm 12 years late to reviewing this game. But I would still like to express my enormous disdain for this entry in the Conflict series. I've played the series since the beginning. As a kid, starting with Conflict Desert Storm, moving on to Back to Baghdad. Playing the Vietnam entry, and years later, knocking out Global Storm. While I lost a bit of faith in the series after Global Storm, pulling away from the idea of clandestine operations conducted by legitimate US or British special forces…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This game just made me sick after almost an hour of playing. No exact story. You donnu what the hell is happening. kill enemies BANG BANG OOOOH WHAT AN FPS GAME. Horrible gameplay. They don't even pay attention to the basic rules of an fps game. Why the fuck should I aim with "Shift"? No sprinting? ok. No Jump? WTF?! And what the fuck is that sensitivity while aiming? You can't shoot a standing target with that literally fucked up sickly high sens. And the AI is the worst thing…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Why are completely broken games still allowed to be sold? Any settings but the lowest ones give me black screen and every time I get hit by an enemy the game stops for 1 to ~6 seconds.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →The gunplay is soooo bad and story sucks. It does have cool semi-destructible environments, but that's it. What a waste of dev time when they could be working on something better...
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Not a good or enjoyable game, even in co-op. Just boring.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Gameplay: 7/10 Graphics: 6/10 Sound: 7/10 Story: 7/10 Replay/Value: 6/10 Overall: 6.6/10
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Masterpiece! 7/10
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →I remember playing this as a kid and though this was fire. Its meh...didn't have any problems running the game its just "Meh..."
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →It's not worth it even on sale... i've played very bad games but this one pfff... waaaay over the top of the first one on the list... if i buy a bad game or i don't like it i don't refund, paid 1 euro on this one but i whish i could, you feel better if you give that 1 euro to a homeless guy and he buys alcohol... i don't even like to give negative review's on games but damn... at this one everything is bad... just awful bad... don't trust me try it for yourself... you've been warned
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Such an awful game... Bad graphics, bad gameplay and not fun at all, bad control, dumb AI...
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Tried to LAN coop, didn't work, your better off getting Conflict Desert Storm instead
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →humourous and addictive
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →One of the absolute worst FPS games I have ever played; and this is coming from someone who's played through City Interactive's entire back catalogue.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →An Experience I Wouldn’t Give My Worst Enemy Venezuela is left in a state of civil war after the government was brutally overthrown by a military coup. With factions fighting to reinstate democracy, the U.S. government has offered their assistance, though the new government regime has threatened to deploy nuclear weapons if the U.S. meddles in Venezuelan affairs. The threat needs to be neutralized, and the U.S can't risk nuclear war. [url=https://steamcommunity.com/groups/ATReviews]Follow My…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Conflict: Denied Ops Positives: + The very few missions and parts that are outside + ok sound and music + some of the graphics looks ok + switching between characters + healing function + unlimited saves + destructible parts of the environment + easy commands + vehicle driving Negatives: - most of the graphics looks bad - the command system does not work as good as intended - a lot of corridores - some parts are too difficult - repetitive, you are doing the same thing over and over - some…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This is for a very specific type of player. If you're like me and played B-grade shooters back in the day, which had OK implementation of an interesting mechanic, enjoyed them for what they were despite a lack of quality in some areas then this is the game for you. It's in the vein of Shadow Ops: Red Mercuy, Spec Ops: The Line, Blacksite: Area 51, Sniper Ghost Warrior series etc. You have two agents, you control one in first person while the other is controlled by an AI. IF you do Co-op each…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →No 1920x1080 support for a game from 2008 audio clips. Absolute garbage
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →You are in control of 2 men one uses machine gun the other ues rifle- pretty clear the game let you choice the way you wanna play. However it takes age to aim and shooting without aiming is extremely lacking of accuracy, which forced me to use machine gun. AI is quite dumb you have to keep giving order or the other guy will not follow you up. I guess I meet a bug just right at 1st mission, where I steal a penzer however the other agent dies on the way chasing the penzer, which requires me go…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Surpisingly good action-war game. ♥♥♥♥♥ Special Ops. I didn't played this part after OG Conflict Desert Storms but it turned out- this is good tho. Graphics are better than on store shots, physics and enemies AI are surprisingly good. I see we can complete missions around the world in any order you want. Feels like Call of Duty but not too scripted. Teamplay of gameplay. Give order. Flank. Strike. Attack. Nice animation happens when enemies are dead your comrade checks them if they alive by…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Its fun, and the detail in this game is surprisingly amazing, if you can forgive the outdated graphic offcourse. while each character can only use their weapon (meaning you can only use like 4 diferent type of weapon) their weapon is capable do multiple thing with over the top attachment.
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This game is... inexplicable. I guess it can maybe be chalked up to being a poor port. The control scheme is nonsense for a modern shooter, mouse sensitivity maintains between zoom levels so it's impossible to sharp aim, the game forces 4:3 aspect ratio and has a strange maximum resolution. Others have said the sound doesn't work, though I haven't had any problems with it. The coop aspect used GameSpy, so I think that's out without a patch. Very weird, just not worth playing.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Yes, 2007 was the very beginning of this industry. The developers were adding all possible features to their games. Only the best of them successfully passed the time test and became usual for us. I might call this "a nice one", if we were in 2007. Sorry, but despite my respect for old games, this one is too wooden.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Not a good a shooter. On the positive side the maps and texture work are okay though the game only uses simple graphics which can hamper enemy detection at a distance. The enemy opposition can even be challenging at moments. The game has many negative aspects like unsaved checkpoints, failing hit detection, stupid story and your teammate which may die at any moment. The worst aspect of this game is the clunky combat. The dancing crosshair makes aiming a challenge. You cannot sprint so running…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Good game because set in South America.
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →i liked it... classic fps with 2 man swap co-op ... not a spectacular game but overall fun, and lots of the scenery blows up, recommend if on sale.. took about 60 hours to complete
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →The control scheme is just awful, I didn't play past a minute or two.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →4 “Combat” is just one particular example of “ConflIct Resolution”. That’s the way I go in my “Code” game rulebooks. I write: - character creation - how to play the game (basically the skill checks/role-playing bits) - conflict resolution (one particular example of using skills checks). 4
neutral · AI labelView post →Today I am learning that the collectors edition of the game World in Conflict sold with an actual piece of the Berlin wall.
neutral · AI labelView post →Great review of "Circle of Conflict" from The Board Boys! "The most interactive roll & write by a long-shot" "This game makes me like Lord of the Rings more." theboardboys.com/season-19-ep...
neutral · AI labelView post →Arcade style gameplay. Me saying this as a title of arcade game, is not saying that it is an arcade game, it reminds me so much of the games you find in the arcade where you have the toy pistol and you eliminate enemies and it pans to the next scene and seeing how long you can last. It reminds me of this due to how the game looks, the bobbing of the gun and the movement of characters that you play. I really do enjoy old style gems that they are bringing back it reminds me of what a single…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →A good game overall, not great by any means, if you like ps2, ps3 linear military shooters, then go for it.
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This game is a big piece of ♥♥♥♥. From console to computer. The story and upgrades aren't bad, but that's it. The splash damage is an illusion, the accuracy is terrible, even if the enemy is in front of you, they are as durable as a balloon, and the enemy is in a T-shirt, pants and sandals and is more durable, and if they fought with pillows, they would be more dangerous than the characters in the game. The white one is a bit more accurate but very slow, the black one is faster shooting but is…
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →I play for the story and rescue Foley. The gameplay is bad enough.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →I don't know why this game is mixed overall, the gun play is wonky and there is only the 4 guns your characters start with but that is where my complaints stop. The destructible environments are fun as hell and the amount of explosions would put Michael Bay to shame.
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Please, do not buy this. I beg of you reader. It ended an entire series and they removed everything that made the series great. Not even a tactical shooter, it's just a janky COD-like game with no pros. The campaign is about 4 hours long, but I was a fool trying to play this on the hardest difficulty. In case you're wondering, it's not any better on easy, it's still a janky unresponsive mess.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Ignore the haters - this is a 13 year old cheap game but if you like fun FPS shooters before the days of everything being multiplayer PVP madness this game could be for you - the ability to switch between two characters (one a sniper the other a heavy weapons specialist) kept the game fun & interesting throughout the campaign. You can send the alt character you are not playing to anywhere you can see with a simple right click & call them back to you by holding the right click down & just press…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →It's subpar and not a great game. I suppose it could work as a time waster or a game if you don't have any others, but it's hard to get past the cheesy voice acting and the horrible ai and buddy system. Game is barely worth the 0.49 i paid for it. Avoid this one.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →It was mediocre in 2008, it's worthless in 2020, there's far better games for free (and this one's not even free). The only positive I can say about it is that it's marginally better than the Conflict Desert Storm that came out in 2002, six years earlier.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →This game is a MASSIVE surprise - in the best way possible, even more surprising considering it's a game from 2008. As far as I can tell, it might even be better than your usual Call of Duty. What Conflict: Denied Ops did surprise me in are the features you wouldn't find in a basic campaign shooter. Here's a list of what I've been able to scrounge up so far: - A story - Some funny dialogue - Multiple missions available, not a constricted list - Two playable characters the player can switch…
positive · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Even though Conflict is a old and somewhat decent franchise, and also despite the fact that i didn't play much of this game. The bad controls and the horrible gameplay are worse then a acutal generic FPS. Avoid this game at all costs. Its not even good enough to have charm. Or to even play it
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →Never have I ever given a review on steam and I have 130 games and tons of hours, but this game got me, utter ♥♥♥♥, dont accept it even if it comes for free. Play some other Eidos game, every thing from eidos is better than this.
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →The game isnt worth buying any more the servers are down and the game was meant for coop
negative · reviewer's own thumbsView post →
Posts are quoted from public profiles with links to the original. Want yours removed? Contact us.